M: Dude! A
profound departure from an established way of thinking. In this case, Hillary
Clinton is bridging the gap between the left and the right, conservative and
liberal, and progressive and moderate, in order to allow for a new world order
in human political theory that embraces the whole of humanity, not just the
privileged few at the top of societies. And the concept that the privileged
need to comprehend that Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine get, is that embracing
diversity is the only course with an optimal outlook in the long run.
D: Man! We are a
nation of diversity but is there another example in human history of what
Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine are trying to accomplish by thoroughly informing
US of our rights and place in humanity?
M: Dude! Not surprisingly,
Hillary Clinton is to political history what Hans Kung proved to be to Christian
theology. Like Kung’s six developmental phases of Christianity, which move from
the apocalyptic to the pedagogic to the medieval to the protestant to the enlightenment
to the ecumenical, Hillary Clinton is moving American political history towards
an ecumenical outlook for the new millennium, by cutting off the fractious factions
of the neoconservatives and the neoliberals and bringing American voters to the
realization that it is time to return to the place where sovereignty lies in
the hands of the people on Main Street, not the privileged few on Wall Street.
D: Man! What
exactly is the ecumenical?
M: Dude! The universals,
as outlined in the United States Constitution for example, that unite US as a
nation in the world. But Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine have very specific plans
to getting US on Main Street to hold the financial sector on Wall Street
accountable and responsible. The first step they lay out in their incredible
masterwork is to get the financial sector to reflect the diverse realities that
are shaping our lives on Main Street.
D: Man! How so?
M: Dude! On page
59 of Stronger Together: A Blueprint for
America’s Future, Clinton and Kaine clearly explain how Wall Street is
prepping itself for another round of reckless risk-taking behavior with our
money, if we decide to not vote in this critical election cycle. According to
Clinton and Kaine,
The
2008 financial crisis saw reckless behavior on Wall Street send our economy
into a tailspin. Nearly 5 million Americans lost their homes. Nearly 9 million
lost their jobs. Some $18 trillion in household wealth was wiped out.
It
took hard work, but we got our economy growing again. And we put tough new
rules on the books, including the Dodd-Frank Act, to protect consumers and curb
recklessness and risk-taking on Wall Street. Those rules are working — which is
a good thing.
Unfortunately,
not everyone agrees. There are Republicans in Congress who are determined to go
back to the bad old days where Wall Street could crash the economy, walk away
without a scratch, and stick taxpayers with the bill for cleaning up the mess they
caused. Republican members of Congress have tried to attach damaging
deregulatory amendments to must-pass spending bills, and have called for
rolling back commonsense efforts to prevent conflicts of interest by financial
managers responsible for middle-class Americans’ retirement savings. They have
tried to hamstring the government’s authority to regulate some of our riskiest
financial institutions, and are committed to defunding and defanging the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau, an agency dedicates solely to protecting Americans
from unfair and deceptive financial practices.
We
cannot afford to go backward. Making sure there is accountability on Wall
Street is essential to building prosperity on every other street in America.
That’s why we have the toughest, most comprehensive plan to make sure Wall
Street banks work for Main Street businesses and families.
Our
plan starts by pledging to veto any legislation that would weaken the
protections enshrined in Dodd-Frank — and using the full force of that law to
protect American consumers and businesses.
But
we know the job of reforming our financial sector is not finished. We need to
make sure no bank is too big to fail and no executive too powerful to jail. And
we need tough, independent cops on the Wall Street beat to help get the job
done.
That’s
why we will:
1. Require firms that are too large and
too risky to be managed effectively to reorganize, downsize, or break apart. The size
and complexity of many financial institutions can create risks for our economy,
both by making it more likely that firms will fail and increasing the severity
of the economic damage failure would cause. That’s why we will pursue
legislation that enhances regulators’ authority under Dodd-Frank to ensure that
no financial institution is too large and too risky to manage. If firms can’t
demonstrate that they can be managed effectively, regulators have the explicit
statutory authority to require that they reorganize, downsize, or break apart.
2. Impose a “risk fee” on the largest financial
institutions. To address the risk posed by size, leverage, and unstable
short-term funding strategies, we will charge a graduated risk fee every year
on banks with more than $50 billion in assets and other financial institutions
that regulators believe merit strong oversight. As firms get bigger and
riskier, the risk fee they face will grow in size, discouraging large financial
institutions from relying on excessive leverage and the kinds of “hot”
short-term money that were particularly damaging during the crisis.
3. Strengthen oversight of the “shadow
banking” system to reduce risk. The so-called shadow banking sector –
which includes certain activities of hedge funds, investment banks, and other
non-bank financial companies – makes up more than a quarter of the global financial
system and contributed significantly to the crash of 2008. We believe we need
more transparency of this sector, a better understanding of the risks it poses,
and stronger tools to tackle those risks. Specifically, we will increase
leverage and liquidity requirements for broker-dealers, impose strict margin requirements
on the kinds of short-term borrowing that also played a major role in spurring
the financial crisis, enhance public disclosure and regulatory reporting
requirements, and strengthen the authority of the Financial Stability Oversight
Council (FSOC) to address excessive risks.
4. Hold individuals, not just
corporations, responsible when they break the law. In America,
no executive is too big to jail. We will enforce laws against the criminals who
break them, plain and simple. That includes holding corporate officers and
supervisors accountable when they knew about misconduct by their subordinates
and failed to prevent it or stop it. We will extend the statute of limitations
for major financial fraud, prohibit individuals in financial services convicted
of egregious crimes from future employment in the industry, and make sure major
corporate fines also cut into the bonuses of culpable executives, supervisors,
and employees.
5. Ensure that prosecutors and regulators
have the tools and resources they need to hold both individuals and
corporations accountable for financial wrongdoing. Right now,
our efforts to investigate and prosecute financial crimes are under-resourced.
We will increase funding for the DOJ, SEC, and CFTC so they have the resources
and manpower they need to punish lawbreakers. And we will appoint tough,
independent regulators and ensure the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission are independently regulated. This is
the only way we can ensure transparency and decrease conflicts of interest to
make markets more stable and fair for everyone.
D: Man! What
diverse realities are shaping our lives on Main Street? From what you’ve read
thus far, Clinton and Kaine are exhaustively thorough and logical. However, why
don’t the over 2,000 reviewers of this definitive guide to American government written
by Clinton and Kaine, completely read the book before posting such scathing
criticism of this game-changing masterpiece on Amazon’s website?
M: Dude! Why don’t
the newscasters read the book before reporting to their desks? I just hope the
next presidential and vice presidential debate moderators actually take the
time to read Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine’s work of genius. Simon and Shuster
needs to distribute this magnum opus to all public schools across the United
States of America with counsel from Warren Buffett.
(TO BE CONTINUED…)
No comments:
Post a Comment