(M)an: Dude!
Hillary Rodham Clinton’s performance at the PBS debate was less than
satisfactory. She condoned Madeleine Albright’s inappropriateness as well as
Henry Kissinger’s, by not establishing appropriate boundaries between them and
herself. Instead, she came across a lot like Jeb Bush does when he accuses
audience members of putting words in his mouth or demands audience applause
after using such crass vocabulary words like “blow Harding” or dismissing
something in front of MSNBC’s Morning Joe as being a “nothing burger”! Did you
know that the term “blowhard” can only be found in The Urban Dictionary and
that Jeb Bush misused that too because the “-ing” ending isn’t even recognized
as a legit form of that word? And the “nothing burger” term is completely bogus
and harkens back to Walker Bush 43’s notorious misuse of languages that became
known as “Bush-isms”!
(D)ude: Man!
Hillary Rodham Clinton continually talks about how she will look into matters
that deserve far more prompt and direct answers. And the talking points she was
utilizing at the PBS debate were heavily borrowed from Senator Bernie Sanders’s
campaign. And Bill Clinton’s using the same scriptwriters as Jeb Bush as well,
both men bringing up the term “profanity” at almost the same exact time last
week. Doesn’t America’s electorate, our fellow voters, know that Hillary and
Bill Clinton and their organizers have deliberately tried to ruin Bernie
Sanders’ campaign by deceptively placing those profane trolls online
themselves? Obviously, all the trolling is being done underhandedly by the
Clintons and their camp online, attempting to mar the otherwise brilliant
campaign underway at the Bernie Sanders campaign headquarters.
M: Dude! Bernie
Sanders has been a gentleman throughout the outpouring of underhanded tactics
by Bill and Hillary Rodham Clinton to undermine and ruin Sanders’ campaign.
Why? The Clintons are cracking under pressure because they are superficial and
corrupt. You need to understand that there are two family dynasties in this
presidential election saga we’re heading into in 2016, the Bushes and the
Clintons. The Bushes comprise of the Tea Partiers on the Republican side while
the Clintons comprise of the Teabags on the Democratic side. If you are a
Republican legislator in U.S. government, you must revere or fear the Bushes,
and if you’re a Democratic legislator in U.S. government, you must revere or
fear the Clintons.
D: Man! How did
things become so grim? How were we as a democratic nation reduced to such
pettiness? Such petty politics?
M: Dude! The
Clintons and Bushes coordinated efforts to create the vacuums in political, social,
and economic circles at home and abroad with deceptive and deliberate steps to
set us and the world backwards. In 2010, Bill Clinton and George Walker Bush
and their dynasties carefully crafted the Tea Party movement which brought in
two to five million more voters to the polls, all for the Republican Party, then
any other time in midterm election history. In 2014, Bill and Hillary Clinton
campaigned for over fifty Democratic candidates in the midterm elections.
According to Politico, over twenty Democratic candidates who chose the Clintons
as campaign surrogates actually won, while over thirty Democratic candidates
lost.
D: Man! On June
17, 2015, Bill Clinton made a final appearance on Jon Stewart’s Comedy Central
gig. Clinton admitted, “We lost the congress in 2010. Lost the House. Same
thing happened to me.” Clearly, Bill Clinton’s ego is inflated and, as a
result, stuck in the 1990s. The American Media and Press Corps made the
Clintons out to be formidable highbrow powerhouses. The American electorate,
our fellow voters, see the disconnect between yesterday’s hype and the truth
today. The Clintons are as insufferable as the Republican Tea Partiers. The Clintons
are Teabag Democrats! The Tea Partiers and the Teabags are the result of efforts
by the Bushes and Clintons to rework the political landscape as Nixon and
Reagan had with the now defunct war on drugs. Nowadays, the drug-free
initiatives are beginning to move towards a focus on urgent treatment and long-term
rehabilitation than incarceration and rise of a mortal underclass.
M: Dude! Talk
about pointlessness and meaninglessness! You know, 42 should never have fallen
under the influence of 43’s biography on 41 and posted a photograph to his
Twitter account showing evidence of his having read that scant attempt to
bolster 41’s place in the annals of histrionics. Seriously, I believe the
Republican Tea Partiers and the Teabag Democrats will be correlating 43’s book
with William Faulkner’s masterpieces if either Hillary Rodham Clinton or Jeb
Bush is elected as 45.
D: Man! Talking
about pointlessness and meaninglessness, the establishment media worked up the
mythology of the presidents of the United States up until the advent of the
smart phone and tablet culture that has jumped ahead and boomed. I don’t think
President Reagan could utilize the noise of the helicopter blades or other auditory
nuisances around him today to get away with not being able to address questions
from the White House Press Corps.
M: Dude! Reagan did
unthinkable harm to the working poor. His trickle down economics never trickled
down, but he still insisted on reforming government entitlements and welfare
programs. What effect did that have? Well the top 2% of society got richer and 3%
of society from the very bottom, frustrated with the entitlement and welfare
reforms but not knowledgeable of basic Reaganomics, turned against minorities and
women targeted in Reagan’s reign of frighteningly cruel sweeping statements
like, for example, affirmative action being “reverse discrimination” and the characterization
of the “welfare queen” as taking advantage of the system and postponing taking responsibility
therefore deserving even more severer cuts to her federal benefits.
M: Dude! John
Kasich addresses his audiences about opening one’s heart and home to neighbors
in need. Yet, as an Ohioan Republican member in the House of Representatives,
John Kasich introduced the bill that would become the welfare reform law under then-President
Bill Clinton, 1996’s Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act, legislation that forced people to fulfill work requirements
in order to qualify for public assistance programs like food stamps. Of course,
the work requirements were waived as a result of the economic recession, but are
being reinstated in as many as 21 states, including Ohio, this presidential election
year because the nation’s economy is no longer in such dire straits.
D: Man! What
about the disenfranchised? I’m emphasizing the grim truths of what Reagan,
Bush, Clinton, and Bush did over the span of 28 years! They have instituted the
unfashionability of welfare through cultivating the culture of poverty premise which
states that the poor are poor because they lack inherent traits like ethics or a
code of conduct that make them incapable of securing financial independence. The
culture of poverty also berates welfare recipients as resisting an abundance of
opportunities available to them if they accept personal responsibility.
M: Dude! President
Bill Clinton and Hillary Rodham Clinton are diehard moderate Republicans!
D: Man! This is
what H. Luke Shaefer reported to The
Atlantic last year, September 11, 2015,
We
started with this definition of just asking, “What kind of cash income is
coming in from the house?” This could be from earnings, or any gifts from
family and friends, public programs that come in dollars, odd jobs, etc. We
wanted to be as comprehensive as possible. Our baseline number [of families
with cash incomes of less than $2.00 per person per day] goes from, in 1996
(about the time we're making a big change to our social safety net) about
636,000 families who fit that profile, and by 2011, it’s more than doubled to
about 1.5 million families with three million children who are reporting cash incomes
of less than $2.00 per person per day. Even when you account for some of these
major programs like SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program)—which is
what we call food stamps now—the Earned Income Tax Credit, public housing, you
still get an increase of about something around 50 percent between 1996 and
2011 in the number of families below the threshold.
M: Dude! Hillary
Rodham Clinton as president and commander in chief, will inform us, the
American electorate, “That’s the best we can do given the circumstances.” She claims
every child must reach his or her own God-given potential but she will balance budgets
and create surpluses on the backs of these very children’s mothers and fathers
living on the edge of society with no insurance of their welfare or well-being.
D: Man! Hillary
Rodham Clinton will generate budget balances and surpluses by cutting libraries
and their community services in the name of digitalizing them, and then provide
us with universal internet coverage that is subpar quality enough to prove punishing
for bloggers and businesses online. Bill Clinton has already expressed his
disdain for bloggers when he wore that lumberjack shirt and brandished a
transcript of a blog from a blogger claiming Bernie Sanders’ campaign was
targeting such folks for supporting the Clintons, when in fact the Clintons
were organizing smear campaign trolls to intimidate or disgust the general
American public from caucusing or voting in the primaries for the brilliant and
humble presidential candidate Bernie Sanders.
M: Dude! No more
coin tosses! Feel the Bern, Nevada!
No comments:
Post a Comment