(D)ude: Man! The
Ronald Reagan and Herbert Walker Bush and George Walker Bush and William Jefferson
Clinton presidencies laid out the foundation for free market economics that led
to the financial crises we have been enduring since trickle down became an
anthem in the 1980s. According to the Nobel laureate economist Joseph E.
Stiglitz,
“Inequality weakens
aggregate demand and the economy. America’s growing inequality was moving money
from the bottom of the pyramid to the top, and since those at the top spent
less of their money than those at the bottom, this weakened overall demand.
During the 90s we masked the deficiency by creating the tech bubble—a boom in
investment. But with the breaking of the tech bubble, the economy fell into
recession. Bush [#43] responded with a tax cut aimed at the rich. With
consumers worried about their future, the hoped-for stimulus to the economy from
Bush’s tax cuts was weak. Piling on a further capital-gains tax cut—on top of
one that had been given a few years before by President Clinton—only encouraged
more speculation. Since its benefits went overwhelmingly to the very top, this
tax cut was particularly ineffective and also strongly increased inequality.”
(M)an: Dude! That
passage is from an introductory chapter out of Stiglitz’s 2015 book entitled The Great
Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them?
D: Man! Yes! I'm
reading from page 4! It is a colloquial masterpiece, don’t you think? I mean,
it’s groundbreaking scholarship for sure, but very simple to understand. I feel
compelled to vote in the upcoming presidential primaries for Bernie Sanders because
of the striking similarity in
messaging he
shares with Stiglitz—that, since Reagan, the top tenth of the 1% manufacture
policies and politics that favor the financial sector over societal fairness.
As Stiglitz continues writing on page 5,
“Inadequate fiscal
policies put undue burden on monetary policies, which are the responsibility of
the Federal Reserve. The Fed can (sometimes) stimulate the economy by lowering
interest rates and making regulations more lax. But these monetary policies are
dangerous. Their prescriptions should come with a big label: Use only with caution, and under close
supervision of adults who understand the full risks. Unfortunately, those in
charge of monetary policy had not read any such label; and they were naïve
market fundamentalists—believing that markets are always efficient and stable.
While they underestimated the risks that their policies posed to the
economy—and even to the government’s budget—they didn’t seem to care about the
inequality that was growing day by day.The result is now well known:they
unleashed a bubble,and their policies led to an unprecedented growth in
inequality.
The Fed kept the
economy churning with a policy of low interest rates and lax regulations. But
it worked only by creating a housing bubble. It should have been apparent to
all that the housing bubble and the consumption boom to which it led could only
be a temporary palliative. Bubbles always break. Our consumption binge meant
that the bottom 80 percent of Americans were on average spending 110 percent of their income. By 2005 as a
country we were borrowing more than $2 billion a day from abroad. It was not sustainable.”
M: Dude! The
Humans of New York guy, Brandon Stanton, was a Power Player of the Week on Chris Wallace’s Fox News Sunday show last year,
August 30, 2015, and did not share the latest news about his philanthropic
undertaking alongside Syeda Ghulam Fatima, the Lahore-based female human rights
activist fighting on behalf of bonded laborers in Pakistan. The resulting
fundraiser that generated $2 million dollars in donations for Fatima’s
organization, The Bonded Labour Liberation Front’s relief efforts, was never followed
up on by the United States Press Corps. There is no accountability in charity
work is there? What became of the approximate two hundred million rupees raised
for Fatima’s cause?
D: Man! We
already lack campaign finance reform in the United States and now you want charities
held accountable for the promises that they make on behalf of the people they represent?
How do we even begin?
M: Dude! Vote for
Bernie Sanders!
No comments:
Post a Comment